All about Learning Technology and Automotive Update
Tuesday, 15 April 2014
Court Repurposes Old iPhones for Inventory Control
Friday, 31 May 2013
This and That Notes in Court Technology - End of May, 2013 Edition
Tuesday, 9 April 2013
This and That in Court Technology - April 2013
The court tech world has been busy this month, perhaps due to the late arrival of spring?
Friday, 11 May 2012
This and That in Court Tech – May 2012
News about E-filing in five states, courtroom tweeting, the NAJIS annual conference, Peoria’s new CMS, and a history of the establishment of West Publishing.
Friday, 3 February 2012
Attorney Technology Motivations?
I don't know if it is just me or if others have noticed this but when dealing with some attorneys, particularly on the subject of E-filing there is often very strange push-back...as in, why would I want E-filing, online access, etc.?
The "3 Geeks and a Law Blog" (thanks Rob) has posted a very interesting article titled "Staying Relevant - Part 4: Technology and the Bottom-line".
They attribute some attorney resistance to technological change as "Cost-plus thinking" explaining:
"In a cost-plus world, firms react by draining the company of capital every December 31st. This mind-set does not view technology as an investment, but instead as a necessary expense. Worse yet, technology negatively impacts the number of hours and respective revenue generated by them. So why would a firm invest in it?"The article continues with some excellent examples and counter-arguments to this worldview. But I would also suggest that this "argument" should both inform and temper the court's response to criticisms of their technology initiatives.
Friday, 20 January 2012
This and That in Court Tech - January, 2012
During the past month we have found quite a few interesting bits of information that we would like to share with our readers below.
Tuesday, 20 December 2011
The Twelve Days of Court Tech
Monday, 15 August 2011
Federal Court Self-Filer's Examined
The July, 2011 edition of The Third Branch newsletter contains an important article summarizing a study on current services to self-represented and "Pro-se" filers offered by US federal courts. The article: IN-DEPTH: Leveling the Playing Field: Help for Self-Filers reports on both automated and direct self-help services offered. One side-bar in the article noted:
"...A disturbingly large number of litigants come to the Clinic with basic reading and comprehension problems; some cannot even read Court orders and the opposition's filings. Others can decipher the words in the documents but cannot comprehend even the simplest of Court orders."
The article also updates the Central District of Illinois project for Pro-Se E-Filing for Prisoners that was previously highlighted in the CTB.
This article is highly recommended.
Monday, 23 May 2011
Wireless Device Guidelines for Federal Courts
“The American public loves the convenience of their wireless communication devices—PDAs and laptops, smart phones and earpiece devices, among others. It’s estimated there are 285 million cell phone users in the United States.
However, the same devices that provide convenience in communications may raise security concerns in federal courts and possibly disrupt proceedings. Courts have responded with a variety of access policies.
To help strike the right balance between security concerns and convenience, the Judicial Conference Committee on Court Administration and Case Management, in consultation with the Information Technology Committee and the Judicial Security Committee, has issued revised guidance for courts to consider that updates how new technologies could be used and what this may mean for courts.”
Tuesday, 28 December 2010
E-signed and e-delivered, but not e-sealed?
Signed, sealed and delivered is more than a Stevie Wonder song, it represents the attestation of an action or record of a court dating back centuries. Technology, however, has outpaced the days of wax and impressions. For that reason, several state legislatures have have had to go back and change the laws of their states to allow their courts more latitude. legislatures in Oklahoma (HB 2253 of 2004), Iowa (HB 579 of 2009), and Michigan (SB 720 of 2010) all authorized all courts in their state to e-seal. Texas in 2007 (SB 229) gave its district court the authority to create a seal electronically, thus allowing the courts to transfer, store, and locate documents with greater efficiency.
This year, Nevada enters into the e-seal fray. SB 6 authorizes the electronic reproduction of the seal of a court (current law requires either impressing the seal on the document or impressing the seal on a substance attached to the document). The bill is currently pending in the Senate Committee on Judiciary.
Cross-posted at Gavel to Gavel blog
Friday, 7 May 2010
Canadian Forum on Court Technology Scheduled
Friday, 9 April 2010
e-Courts Conference Agendas Posted
Tuesday, 12 January 2010
E-Courts 2010 Date Correction
Friday, 18 December 2009
E-Courts 2010
The updated conference website should be up and running in the new year. The website address as always is: http://www.e-courts.org/
Tuesday, 24 November 2009
7th Conference on Privacy and Public Access to Court Records Announced
- Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going: A Decade of Court Public Access and Privacy Policy Development
- Court Public Access Policy Implementation: Recent Developments
- Emerging Issues in E-filing and Privacy
- Bulk Data: Latest Trends
- New Media in the Courtroom and at the Courthouse: Texts, Tweets & Blogs, Oh My!
- Privacy and the Public Record: The Big Picture Debate
- Public Electronic Access to Federal Court Records “PACER”: New Initiatives, New Challenges
For more information email medalt@wm.edu or ccvaug@wm.edu or phone the CLCT at: 757-221-2494
Thursday, 24 September 2009
CTC-2009 Education Session Videos Available
Wednesday, 16 September 2009
CTC-2009 - Denver, Colorado - September 22-24
Tuesday, 4 August 2009
CTC-2009 Website Sessions - Do you have the nerve?
Two sessions at the 2009 Court Technology Conference in September feature Web-savvy panelists who want to look at YOUR site and share some insights. Really!If you wish to read more and respond to Pam please go to THIS LINK. A short six-question survey form is available there if you want to volunteer.
And it costs you nothing, beyond the courage to be analyzed before an audience of your peers.
Have a look at the sessions below and submit your site by Friday, Sept. 4, if you would like to be considered for review. Both sessions are designed with theory and best practices up front -- how the sites we review are getting it right and/or how they could improve.